Archives for February 11, 2018

Markets Wobble. What You Should Do.

Crash. Turmoil. Plunge. Rout. These are just some of the words used to describe what’s happened in markets in the past week or two. I’ll use a less dramatic description. It’s a wobble… at least, so far. Plus, it’s a timely reminder of why I recommend investors should have a relatively cautious portfolio allocation in current markets. Let’s look at what’s been going on, and what to do about it.

Stocks are down. Bonds are down. The US dollar is down. Gold is down.

In the short term, safe havens have been mightily thin on the ground.

Below is a three month chart comparing three ETFs that track major assets, priced in US dollars. These are the S&P 500 index of US stocks (in red), long-dated US treasury bonds (in green) and gold (in yellow). The ETFs are the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSE:SPY), the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSE:TLT)and the SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE:GLD).

The first thing to note: there’s no need to panic. Well, that’s assuming you’re not heavily leveraged and trading on margin. (Which I very strongly urge you not to do when it comes to potentially volatile financial investments. No one should ever allow themselves to be a forced seller when markets fall.)

At the time of writing, the S&P 500 index is at 2,625. That’s down 8.6% from its recent peak on 26th January. It’s a similar story across stock markets globally, including Europe, Japan and Emerging Markets. A fall of less than 10% is not a crash. Especially when stocks are back to the same level they were as recently as mid-December. There was a fast run up and now there’s been a pull back. In the case of the US market, the bubble inflated even more, and now some air has escaped.

Of course, given the elevated prices of many stocks, they could fall much further. That would be terrible news or excellent news, depending on your perspective. If you have high exposure to stocks with bubbly valuations, and little in the way of cash “ammo”, then it could get painful.

But if you only own a modest allocation to stocks (or stock indices), and those that you own are already sensibly priced (meaning downright cheap, or at least reasonably priced in relation to underlying value), then you have little to worry about. Especially if you have plenty of cash to deploy. In that instance, what you already own will still do well in the end, just with a slight delay (typically a year or two). And a market crash will provide an excellent opportunity to scoop up some bargains, and make big profits in a market recovery. But that time is has not yet come.

That said, something of note happened recently. Assets that are usually mainstream safe havens during a stock market correction also fell. Most obvious amongst those are US treasury bonds (green line above) and the US dollar itself.

The following chart shows the US dollar broad index in the year to end of January 2018. This shows the relative value of the dollar against a trade-weighted index of 26 other currencies of both developed and developing countries. A look at the right hand side of the line shows that the fall accelerated during January. Looking at the major currency pairs such as euros, British pounds, Japanese yen and Swiss francs, there has only been modest respite in the first part of February.

Even gold took a dip, although it’s held up much better than stocks or bonds.

So why has everything wobbled at once?

The most obvious explanation – especially for stocks and bonds – is simply that the conditions were ripe. A great many stock prices are bubbly – especially in the US. And bond yields are still far too low, although less so in the US than many European countries or Japan.

Specifically, real yields – after stripping out expected inflation – were pathetic (or even deeply negative, such as in the UK gilt market).

In which case, what’s triggered the sudden concerns and sell offs? It seems to be a sudden realisation that inflation has picked up. That’s even though the evidence has been around for a while, with rising commodity prices being one area of note.

For example, the price of WTI crude oil was under US$30 per barrel at the start of 2016, but now trades over US$60. That’s a doubling in little over two years. And yes – we still use a lot of it, and global demand continues to grow.

The US tax bill could also be inflationary, since it’s likely to be a stimulus to both corporate investment and consumer spending – at least in the short run. If inflation is back, the concern is that central banks will have to raise rates faster than previously expected, in order to keep a lid on rising consumer prices. Policy lending rates could rise from their (still) ludicrously low levels.

On top of that, central banks (eurozone, Japan, UK) could put the brakes on quantitative easing (QE) – the creation of money to buy bonds (mostly) and suppress bond yields. Or the US Federal Reserve could accelerate the offloading of treasury holdings that it built up in the past.

The implication for bond markets could be a sudden surge in available supply of securities, from central bank sales and new issues. Higher yields (lower prices) would likely result. Real yields – the gap between nominal yields and inflation – could rise further, which could weigh on gold (although the long term investment case remains intact: see here for my gold articles).

And then there are stocks.

The biggest issue with stocks is that a great many companies carry high levels of debt these days. Ultra low rates in recent years have led to a borrowing binge, often to fund unproductive activities such as stock buybacks at inflated prices.

If interest rates go up, so will borrowing costs. This will:

  1. Crimp corporate profits, as debt is refinanced at higher rates
  2. Most likely reduce the amount of ongoing buybacks, taking away the largest net buyer of stocks in recent years (being the companies themselves)

At the same time, many consumers have high debts. If their interest costs go up, their disposal incomes will go down. Many companies could see pressure on top line sales, putting further pressure on profits. Lower profit expectations mean lower stock prices.

(Incidentally, higher bond yields will also mean higher mortgage rates. So the world’s bubbly real estate markets could also come under pressure.)

I don’t actually expect inflation to go crazy, although it could pick up a little. But nowhere near the levels of the country where I live, Argentina, where it’s still running above 20% a year (although down from 40-50% a couple of years ago).

Even if inflation isn’t about to surge into double digits, or even high single digits, there’s another factor at play. This is the simple realisation that rates and yields, of all kinds, actually have to revert to a sensible level in relation to inflation one day – and that day may come sooner than previously expected. This is enough to unsettle the wide array of overpriced financial assets in both stock and bond markets.

Maybe this wobble will pass, and all will be forgotten in a couple of months’ time. Or maybe stocks are about to endure a long overdue crash. After all, the last one got underway over a decade ago. Tick tock. Tick tock.

In the meantime, I’m sticking to my cautious recommended portfolio allocation, which I last updated in August 2017. Here’s a summary:

By the way, if (and it remains an “if”) stocks really do crash then I’d expect US treasury bonds to swiftly reverse their recent correlation with stocks. The safe haven value will come back into force, yields will fall again – for a time – and prices will rise.

So I’m keeping the small 10% allocation to long-dated treasuries in the recommended portfolio. In fact, if yields keep rising, I may even increase it a little, and reduce the cash piece.

However, for now the recommendation remains the same.

  • Keep 40% in stocks, but only own them where you can find sensible prices, and hence the prospect of a healthy medium to long term return, whatever happens in the short run. If you can’t find enough things you like the look of (to stay diversified), and that are cheap enough, consider reducing this further (e.g. 30%, or even 20%) and add to cash. (If you haven’t already become a member, see OfWealth Stock Investor for my best ideas.)
  • Have a high 35% allocation to cash “ammo”, ready to scoop up bargains when more are available. (Note: Very short dated US treasury bills, or similar in other countries, are equivalent to “cash”.)
  • Continue to have 15% into physical gold (bullion or coins) for long term profit potential (what I like to call the “ultimate consumer good”) and insurance against a financial crisis.
  • Hold 10% in long dated US treasury bonds (for example, via the TLT ETF mentioned above).

This is not a time to panic, provided you’re taking a relatively low risk and diversified approach, such as my recommended portfolio. Nor is it yet time to deploy that cash into stocks in a big way. That would be premature.

Markets can do anything in the short term. Recently they’ve had a wobble, and we don’t know what happens next. It could be back to business as usual or something more dramatic.

Either way, successful investors need to take a longer term view. They must balance the quest for profit with the management of risk. My recommendation is to remain calm, be patient, and stay cautious for the time being.

Disclosure: OfWealth expressly prohibits its writers from having a financial interest in any individual securities they recommend to their readers, other than collective investments such as exchange traded funds.

Gut Vs. Emotion

My Esquire piece on big tech getting bigly (I know, I know…) is live online and hits newsstands next week.

What. A. Thrill.

Gut vs. Emotion

Instinct is powerful, and useful. We’re blessed with millions of years of experience that register a strong sense you shouldn’t pet a snake or eat things that smell foul. The heart is often linked to emotion. But it ends up the gut and the vagus nerve are the original gangsters, with a direct line to your brain, influencing how you feel and behave. Similar to the brain, a plethora of neurons form neurotransmitters in your gut. Supposedly the gray matter of a cat’s brain is nestled in your girth. The good-time hormones, serotonin and dopamine, spend more time hanging in your gut than your brain. So, the key to someone’s heart is in their gut.

It’s an upward journey via the brain-gut axis that originates from bacteria in your GI tract, moves past the heart via the vagus nerve, picks up momentum fueled by budding emotion, and then hits the TSA that is the brain — slow down, put all your emotions in a gray bin. You can leave your shoes on, and laptop in your bag, if you aren’t prone to wild mood swings (Pre-Check).

We need our emotions to run through a metal detector. Emotions are an important and rewarding part of life, but they’re often poor inputs to decision-making. It’s wonderful to feel love, but its ability to blur judgment, which informs good decisions, is the grist of war, child support, and other uber-bad outcomes.


The Dow Jones puked a thousand points Thursday, after doing the same last week. Boom, the neurons in your gut start churning and sending signals that get emotion and momentum. I bought a retail stock three months ago, thinking it had been so badly beaten up, it was due for a pop. People would realize that, while the firm is in fact going out of business, it’s going to die more slowly than the market thinks. By the way, this is a decent descriptor of every old-media firm right now. This company’s stock, after Thursday’s close, is off 25%, and… that hurts my feelings. That is, if hurt were a mix of anger, embarrassment, and self-loathing. But I digress.

Not wanting more tears in the rain, my emotions tell me to sell, to limit my downside of hurt. But the TSA steps in and asks, if I hadn’t bought higher, and the stock was here now, sans the pain, how would I feel then? The answer is, I’d want to buy a bunch, instead of sell. Barry Ritholtz pointed out this phenomenon to me as the reason most retail investors have portfolios that underperform the market, and do worse than even the stocks in their portfolio. People let emotion get in the way. They sell when things have declined, and are good values, and fall in love with stocks that have skyrocketed, and may be overvalued. If you had opted to get off the roller coaster of the markets in March of ’08 (understandable), you’d have sold at a low, missed the short 14 months it took to recover all of it, and be much, much worse off.


The markets are Bishop from Aliens. They move and reflect traits of the sentient, but have no heart. The market doesn’t feel sorry for you when you’re about to lose your home, nor is it jealous of you when you buy a jet — it doesn’t care at all. If the markets registered emotion, would Jeff Bezos have accrued a personal net worth higher than the GDP of Ukraine?

Sidebar: I wonder if AI is a step to artificial emotion, and what that might mean for us. The adaptation central to AI sounds to me like the process of when your brain and emotion begin to improve or worsen decisions. #deepthoughts

To be one with the markets, and be a great investor, you have to be somewhat synthetic. Your role model is the cold, mission-focused android officer of the Sulaco — Bishop, not Ripley.

For the last decade, the markets have rewarded, more than any human or synthetic, the only other true android investor… the market itself. The greatest reallocation of capital in history has been flows of capital out of active investors, like hedge funds, even bypassing the near-synthetic of quant funds, and going to full Bishop with ETFs, void of all humanity. ETFs are structured to balance and rebalance to mimic the market, or sector, with no gut or emotion getting in the way. Active managers as a profession could best be described, over the last decade, as awful… but expensive. Pension funds, sovereigns, and family offices have paid rich fees for the pleasure of underperforming the S&P by the amount of their fees, and then some.

Who is the Warren Buffett of our age? Bishop.